A bunch of the 2015 Trans Am Bike Race participants had gathered outside the Fort George Brewery in Astoria, Oregon 13 hours before the start of the big race. During the get-together we discussed strategy, stated intentions, and made predictions—predictions which (a month later) turned out to be comically optimistic, fueled in part by beer but also by plenty of innocence and naiveté. Yet among the bombastic conjecture were some wonderful nuggets of insight uttered by the veterans. And so I paid attention when JD Schwartz asked Trans Am Bike Race founder Nathan Jones what he thought was more difficult: the Tour Divide or the TABR.
“The Trans Am Bike Race,” Nate replied after thinking it over for a few seconds.
I was surprised. Harder than the Tour Divide? Before I had signed up for the inaugural Tour Divide in 2008, it was widely regarded as next to impossible. The course lived up to its reputation, with several snowed-in hike-a-bike sections, downed trees that turned forests into literal obstacle courses, tire-sucking mud, inclement weather, relentless mosquitoes, scarce services, and 200000 feet of climbing over 2700 miles. Also: mountain lions and bears. In 2013, Adventure Journal even declared the Tour Divide as the toughest race in the world (of any sport).
Nate rationalized his thoughts by mentioning having to deal with car traffic. This did not sound very compelling to me, being a die-hard roadie who has logged over 50,000 miles of dodging automobiles.
Well, after completing the Trans Am Bike Race… I have to agree with Nate—the Trans Am Bike Race IS harder. This is why:
- Across the entire U.S., the daily high temperatures were about 90 degrees. From Oregon to Wyoming, this was a dry heat under a strong sun that sucked all moisture out from our bodies. East of Kansas, there was more shade but high humidity, so it felt muggy all the time. In contrast, the Tour Divide follows the Continental Divide and is mostly at elevation with usually ample tree shade—so rarely did it feel so hot and uncomfortable.
- I felt it was harder to camp in the TABR. In the TD, you are in forests most of the time and it is easy to pull off off the trail and into some trees to camp. In the TABR, especially in places like eastern Oregon, there were no trees or grassy areas, just a lot of openness and scraggly brush in areas with most open space fenced off with barbed wire. There were nights around 11 P.M. I kept looking for suitable places to stealth camp but would find nothing after an hour of riding and ended up sleeping behind guardrails several times.
- From Missouri to the Atlantic, there were virtually no shoulders on the road. Worse, there were often rumble strips on the edge of the roads. This frequently made riding feel dangerous, especially when large tractor trailers where trying to squeeze by. I felt riding in such traffic was more dangerous than biking on rugged singletrack that could have caused crashes mainly because I had more control of the situation in the latter than the former (you cannot control what drivers are going to do).
- The list of my injuries from the Trans Am Bike Race is worse than the list of my injuries from the Tour Divide—especially because I got Shermer’s Neck.
One reason I thought before going into the race that the TABR would be easier was because there were more services. But, it turned out, in the west—particularly eastern Oregon and Wyoming—it did not seem like there were more services in the Trans Am Bike Race than in the Tour Divide, especially considering that water consumption was much higher due to the heat, and because so many stores were closed at night and on Sundays. (In the east, finding open services was no problem.)
All the above said, both races are difficult and absurdly so at times. It would not surprise me if others feel the races are about equal in difficulty, or the Tour Divide is more difficult.
What do you think?