Here are photos of bike parts I’ve managed to break or encounter over the years. The amazing thing is most of these broken parts were due to normal everyday use and not subject to abuse or accidents. Included are photos from both the major component manufacturers–Campagnolo and Shimano–on my own or friends’ bicycles.
Your Voice
One comment:
S
by SBarner |
Campagnolo had a bunch of problems with their aluminum castings in the 1990s and 2000s. You often see rear derailleurs with a hairline crack at the B-pivot, and that type of crankarm failure is sadly not rare. It is hard though to separate bad casting/forging from excessive stress.
The hex on the crank bolt is munged, which indicates that someone was a bit careless in tightening it at some point. Overtorquing this bolt can put tremendous stress on this type of arm, due to the tapered square interface.
The late Jobst Brandt noted that even when properly tightened, a square taper crankarm can be placed under failure-inducing stress by mechanics or owners who retighten the arm periodically. An undamaged, properly tightened arm does not loosen up, but mechanics who have had customers come in with failed (usually left) crankarms will often tighten any crank further on any service. The problem is that as the crank is used it beds in and this will make the bolt seem undertorqued when all it is supposed to be doing is to keep enough tension on the joint that it does not loosen up.
Even tightening a crank bolt back to its original spec can gradually increase the stress until the arm cracks. The proper approach is to tighten the bolt to spec when the arm is installed and then leave it alone. If the arm has loosened to the point of rocking, it will need to be replaced. And above all, do not grease the tapered interface or the bolt threads. If the bolt has been removed multiple times, add a drop of blue Loctite to the clean threads to keep it from loosening. ↩ Reply
One comment:
Campagnolo had a bunch of problems with their aluminum castings in the 1990s and 2000s. You often see rear derailleurs with a hairline crack at the B-pivot, and that type of crankarm failure is sadly not rare. It is hard though to separate bad casting/forging from excessive stress.
The hex on the crank bolt is munged, which indicates that someone was a bit careless in tightening it at some point. Overtorquing this bolt can put tremendous stress on this type of arm, due to the tapered square interface.
The late Jobst Brandt noted that even when properly tightened, a square taper crankarm can be placed under failure-inducing stress by mechanics or owners who retighten the arm periodically. An undamaged, properly tightened arm does not loosen up, but mechanics who have had customers come in with failed (usually left) crankarms will often tighten any crank further on any service. The problem is that as the crank is used it beds in and this will make the bolt seem undertorqued when all it is supposed to be doing is to keep enough tension on the joint that it does not loosen up.
Even tightening a crank bolt back to its original spec can gradually increase the stress until the arm cracks. The proper approach is to tighten the bolt to spec when the arm is installed and then leave it alone. If the arm has loosened to the point of rocking, it will need to be replaced. And above all, do not grease the tapered interface or the bolt threads. If the bolt has been removed multiple times, add a drop of blue Loctite to the clean threads to keep it from loosening.